Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Sandoval v. USA
as 1:2023cv00531
Petitioner:
Joshua Sandoval
Respondent:
USA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Miller et al v. Dirty Pit Craft House LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Alanna Miller and Joshua Sandoval
Defendant:
Dirty Pit Craft House LLC and Katrina Kinney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Galvan v. Stanislaus County et al
as 1:2021at01032
Plaintiff:
Louise Galvan
Defendant:
Stanislaus County, Justin Wall, Joshua Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvan v. Stanislaus County, et al.
as 1:2021cv01641
Plaintiff:
Louise Galvan
Defendant:
Stanislaus County, Deputy Justin Wall, Deputy Joshua Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2021cv00331
Defendant:
Joshua Sandoval, Thomas Letras, Richard Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Alberto Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morelos et al v. County of Stanislaus
as 1:2018cv01034
Plaintiff:
Yakira Morelos, Nora Morelos, J.M. and others
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus, Derek Crowley, Chad Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Joshua Sandoval
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sandoval v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00904
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sandoval
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Joshua Sandoval v. Automated Systems America Inc et al
as 2:2011cv05665
Defendant:
Automated Systems America Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sandoval
In Re: Cardtronics Atm Fee Notice Litigation
as 3:2011md02245
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sandoval , Gini Christensen and Sheryl Johnson
Defendant:
Cardtronics USA, Inc , Cardtronics, Inc , DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
