Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Gomez et al v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Gomez and Yasenia E. Kuehne
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Gomez v. Garland
as 23-6800
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Juan Carlos Gomez v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv01860
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Juan Gomez Alvarez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-2699
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS GOMEZ ALVAREZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GOMEZ v. MONA LISA PIZZERIA, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv05146
Plaintiff:
JUAN CARLOS GOMEZ
Defendant:
MONA LISA PIZZERIA, INC. and CHRISTOPHER COCCHI
Gomez Chucino v. Real Builders Inc et al
as 1:2022cv02799
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Gomez Chucino
Defendant:
Real Builders Inc and Jacob Rad
Gomez Chucino v. Real Builders Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02799
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Gomez Chucino
Defendant:
Real Builders Inc and Jacob Rad
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Menper Distributors, Inc. v. ALPER HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 1:2020cv24488
Defendant:
ALPER HOLDINGS INC., Juan Carlos Gomez Dominguez and F5 NUNATURALS CORP.
Plaintiff:
Menper Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Menper Distributors, Inc. et al v. F5 NUNATURALS CORP. et al
as 1:2020cv24491
Defendant:
Juan Carlos Gomez Dominguez and F5 NUNATURALS CORP.
Plaintiff:
Menper Distributors, Inc. and ALPER HOLDINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Gomez et al v. New Toasties Deli, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05028
Defendant:
New Toasties Deli, Inc., Jane Doe, Jason Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Gomez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
