Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Abdus-Shahid Ali v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 15-1287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdus-Shahid M.S. Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Former Director, Bureau of Prisons, Juan D. Castillo, Warden, USMCFP and others
Nathaniel Green v. Juan Castillo, et al
as 14-3377
Petitioner - Appellant:
Nathaniel Green
Respondent - Appellee:
Juan D. Castillo and United States Parole Commission
Raymond Gearhart v. Juan Castillo, et al
as 13-2946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raymond Gearhart
Defendant - Appellee:
Juan D. Castillo, Warden, Linda Sanders, Warden, Sarrazine, Dr. and others
Abdus-Shahid Ali v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 13-2581
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdus-Shahid M.S. Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Former Director, Bureau of Prisons, Juan D. Castillo, Warden, USMCFP and others
Gearhart v. Castillo et al
as 6:2013cv03279
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gearhart
Defendant:
Juan D Castillo, Linda Sanders, Sarrazine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Raymond Gearhart v. Juan D. Castillo
as 13-2308
Petitioner - Appellant:
Raymond Gearhart
Respondent:
United States of America
Respondent - Appellee:
Juan D. Castillo
Raymond Gearhart v. Juan Castillo
as 13-2123
Petitioner - Appellant:
Raymond Gearhart
Respondent - Appellee:
Juan D. Castillo
Carroll Flowers v. Juan Castillo
as 13-1697
Petitioner - Appellant:
Carroll James Flowers
Respondent - Appellee:
Juan D. Castillo
United States v. Marlon Gantt
as 13-2696
Petitioner - Appellant:
Carroll James Flowers
Respondent - Appellee:
Juan D. Castillo
Charles Jones v. Eric Holder, et al
as 13-1572
Petitioner - Appellant:
Charles Jones
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Juan D. Castillo, Warden and Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
