Cases 21 - 30 of 73
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Jimenez Masonry et al
as 2:2018cv00666
Plaintiff:
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jimenez Masonry, Jose Jimenez, Martin Raymundo Padill Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Jimenz Masonry et al
as 2:2018at00360
Plaintiff:
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jimenz Masonry, Jose Jimenez, Martin Raymundo Padill Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00539
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Juan Mendez, Jr. v. Attorney General, State of Fl., et al
as 17-12896
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN MENDEZ, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Estate of Jose Mendez et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2017cv00227
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, Los Angeles Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jose Mendez, Josefina Mendez and Juan Mendez
Estate of Jose Mendez et al v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2016cv09479
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Los Angeles Police Department, Josue Merida and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jose Mendez, Josefina Mendez and Juan Mendez
Mendez v. Florida Attorney General et al
as 2:2016cv00626
Petitioner:
Juan Mendez, Jr.
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Juan Mendez-Velasquez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 16-12924
Petitioner:
JUAN MENDEZ-VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
