Cases 1 - 10 of 178
DAVIS v. MONROE et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
SHELAINE V DAVIS
Defendant:
JUDGE MATT MONROE, JUSTO CABRAL, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moultrie v. FYR SFR Borrower LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01923
Plaintiff:
Latoya Shanah Moultrie
Defendant:
FYR SFR Borrower LLC, Progress Residential LLC, The Totten Firm LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARLAN v. ASHFORD
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JASON E ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUMANITARIAN v. TREADWELL et al
as 7:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN
Defendant:
MARC T TREADWELL, JUDGE LESLIE A GARDNER, KATHLEEN LOGSDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Mitchell v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Mitchell
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Judge Susan E. Edlein, Assistant Solicitor Jamie Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanna v. Peed
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Duriel Hanna
Defendant:
Chief Judge F. Gates Peed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry et al v. Neal et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Aja N. Henry and James A. Henry
Defendant:
Joyce Neal, DeKalb County Corp., Marshal Sgt. L. Huang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phipps v. Lewis et al
as 1:2023cv05511
Plaintiff:
Tony Lavale Phipps
Defendant:
Judge Chaundra D. Lewis, Lynne M. Policaro, Pamela M. Bettis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
