Cases 1 - 10 of 320
Bibb v. The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
as 2:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Bibb
Defendant:
The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Schilling v. Fuller
as 2:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
Justin G. Schilling
Defendant:
Judge Randall Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sudberry v. Stuff et al.
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
James D. Rome Sudberry
Defendant:
Warden Stuff, Booth, Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Reese v. Holbrook
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
Destin Dezwyn Reese
Defendant:
Judge Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. City of Akron et al.
as 5:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Michelle S. Wright
Defendant:
City of Akron, Magistrate Mary Ann Mendlick, Leah Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Dunn v. Pietraszkiewicz et al.
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunn
Defendant:
Officer Ann Pietraszkiewicz, Detective Gregory Williams, Officer John Marincek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
LaShawn v. Aarupiyu Homes LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mikhaela LaShawn
Defendant:
Aarupiyu Homes LLC, Ubiquitous Capital Holdings LLC., David Streeter Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Cordova
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kelsey E. Campbell
Defendant:
Judge Michelle L. Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
