Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dotson v. City of Syracuse
as 18-1020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sonia Dotson
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Syracuse, Gary Miguel, in his individual capacity as former Chief of Police of the City of Syracuse, Michael Heenan, in his individual capacity as former First Deputy Chief of Police of the City of Syracuse and others
Mullen v. City of Syracuse
as 13-3379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Mullen and Karl Schmidt
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Syracuse, Stephanie A. Miner, in her individual and official capacity as Mayor of The City of Syracuse, Frank L. Fowler, in his individual and official capacity as Chief of Police for The City of Syracuse and others
Vassenelli v. The City of Syracuse
as 13-3382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas L. Vassenelli
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of Syracuse, Stephanie A. Miner, in her individual and official capacity as Mayor of the City of Syracuse, Frank L. Fowler, in his individual and official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Syracuse and others
Baggett et al v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2012cv00337
Plaintiff:
John Baggett , Rickey Williams and Esteban Trotman
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, City of Syracuse Police Department, Stephanie Miner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2011cv00620
Plaintiff:
Sonia Dotson
Defendant:
City of Syracuse , Gary Miguel , Michael Heenan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Vassenelli v. The City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2010cv01422
Plaintiff:
Nicholas L. Vassenelli
Defendant:
The City of Syracuse, Stephanie A. Miner, Frank L. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullen et al v. The City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2010cv01110
Plaintiff:
James Mullen and Karl Schmidt
Defendant:
The City of Syracuse, Stephanie A. Miner, Frank L Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
