Cases 1 - 10 of 19
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC Director, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ROANOKE DIVISION, ELIZABETH KAY DILLON, U.S. Judge and others
Meyers v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, U.S. District Court Roanoke Division, Elizabeth Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6789
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00299
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
David Meyers v. T. Dorton
as 21-6882
Defendant / Appellee:
M. WILLIAMS, Fiscal Tech of Wallen Ridge State Prison, FINANCIAL OFFICE STAFF OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT ROANOKE DIVISION, M. BRYANT, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Julia Dudley
as 21-6642
Respondent / Appellee:
JULIA C. DUDLEY, Clerk, U.S. District Court Roanoke Division
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Ferebee v. Harris et al
as 7:2021cv00236
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris, Julia C. Dudley, Clayton Higgin(s), Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenza Gerald Ferebee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meyers v. Dorton et al
as 7:2021cv00224
Defendant:
Julia C. Dudley, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, T. Dorton and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7262
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7246
Defendant / Appellee:
I. O. RIVERO, I. O. HARRIS, J. ELY and others
Defendant:
JULIA C. DUDLEY, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
