Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Scott v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
Mark Baker and Julie Kaelin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dizney et al v. Back et al
as 6:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Tara Dizney and Kendra Arthur
Defendant:
Jason Back and Julie Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dinh v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Quoc Dinh
Defendant:
Julie Campbell, Christopher D. Hunt, Jason K. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Ripberger v. Paris et al
as 2:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Julie Ripberger
Defendant:
Anthony Paris and Hydro Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Evans v. Woodland Oaks et al
as 0:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Julie Evans
Defendant:
Woodland Oaks, Latisha Palladino and Tony Mullica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Su v. WIN.IT America, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
WIN.IT America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fishback v. Wilson et al
as 3:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Brian Fishback
Defendant:
Mike Wilson, Robert Stivers, David W. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Henson v. Burke et al
as 5:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ann Nicole Henson
Defendant:
Amy Burke, Janet Humphrey-Cole, Megan N. Bosley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Myers v. Daley et al
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
James Kline Myers
Defendant:
Jailer James Daley, Deven Rodriquez, Deputy Karl T. Markowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estep v. Napier et al
as 5:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Julie Estep
Defendant:
Jennifer Napier and Madison County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
