Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rubio v. Algo Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv24476
Plaintiff:
Armando Rubio
Defendant:
Algo Capital, LLC, K Sunset Consulting Inc, Kaito Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Soomro v. City of New York
as 17-1733
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eduardo Andino, AKA Eduardo Andino-Rosado, Omar Aponte, Wilfredo Aquino, AKA Feito, AKA Feo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Pablo Ventura-Nieves, AKA Pablo Ventura
USA v. Julio Cruz
as 15-15574
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIO CESAR CRUZ
In Re: U.S./Mexico Treaty
as 3:2012mc00228
In Re:
Julio Cesar Cruz, Maximiliano Guzman, Eduardo Morquecho and others
Lemos et al v. M & D K Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01680
Plaintiff:
Juan Eduardo Lemos , Milton Sanchez , Julio Cesar Cruz and others
Defendant:
M & D K Contractors, Inc. , Ed Painting, Inc. and Edwin Santos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Cruz et al v. South Florida Bakery, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv20538
Defendant:
South Florida Bakery, Inc. and Ricardo Bernardo
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Cruz and silvio raul lindin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Francisco Bermudez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-60862
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JESUS BERMUDEZ, also known as Mario Estrada Rivera, also known as Luis Montanez, also known as Jesus Cesear Cruz, also known as Julio Cesar Cruz, also known as David Garcia, also known as Jesse Godinez, also known as Jesus Godinez, also known as
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Julio Cruz Campos v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-71397
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR CRUZ CAMPOS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Julio Cruz
as 09-50598
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIO CESAR CRUZ
Julio Cruz Campos, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70747
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR CRUZ CAMPOS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
