Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dickerson v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv03097
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dickerson v. King
as 23-60535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Ron King and Warden Donald Jackson
Dickerson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections and Tristin Lane Kiddy
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Fortenberry et al
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
Dewitt Fortenberry, Stacy Jones, Shannon Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Commissioner Burl Cain, Director Ron King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Gibson et al
as 3:2021cv00804
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
Sheila Gibson, Corey D. Gibson PLLC and Corey Danial Gibson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Simpson County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2021cv00734
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
Simpson County Circuit Court, Stanley A. Sorey and Dewitt Fortenberry
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Simpson County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2021cv00682
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
Simpson County Sheriff Department and Chris Wallace
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
