Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hendrix v. Martuscello
as 24-1129
Plaintiff:
TROY HENDRIX
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, JOHN OR JANE DOES 6-10, members of the DOCCS SHMC as Marcy Correctional Facility, JAMES O'GORMAN, Deputy Commissioner for Correctional Facilities and others
USA v. Justin Taylor
as 21-1706
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTIN THOMAS GLEN TAYLOR
Justin Morales v. United States
as 21-2363
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Justin Thomas Morales
Acosta v. Thomas
as 19-2728
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Vadlamudi, Facility Health Director, Marcy Correctional Facility, Joseph Gullo, NYS DOCCS Audiologist, Carl J. Koenigsmann, Deputy Commissioner, Chief Medical Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Acosta
Defendant:
John Serhan, NYS DOCCS Audiologist
United States v. Justin Thomas Chapman
as 19-3238
Defendant / Appellant:
Justin Thomas Chapman
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Abreu v. Dougherty
as 19-586
Defendant / Appellee:
Mr. Garza, OMH Clinician Social Worker at Marcy Correctional Facility/RMHU, Mr. Sanatoro, OMH Clinician Social Worker at Marcy Correctional Facility/RMHU, L. Collins, Deputy Superintendent for Security, Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Mr. Venettozzi, William Dawson, Director of Correctional Dental Services, DOCCS, Miller, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Thomas v. Conn Appliances Incorporated
as 4:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Conn Appliances Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Justin Thomas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Chase v. Afinson et al
as 2:2016mc00063
Petitioner:
Braden Chase
Respondent:
Harley Lester Afinson , Justin Thomas Afinson and JT Business Development Corporation Limited
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
USA v. Justin Heffner
as 13-5418
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUSTIN THOMAS HEFFNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
