Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05343
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kitilya v. California Superior Court West Covina, et al.
as 26-4833
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND JUSTO KITILYA
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT WEST COVINA, WEST COVINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, WALMART INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05684
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05313
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01560
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv23942
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kitilya v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 26-3319
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND JUSTO KITILYA
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Raymond Justo Kitilya v. California Superior Court West Covina et al
as 5:2026cv02887
Plaintiff:
Raymond Justo Kitilya
Defendant:
California Superior Court West Covina, West Covina Police Department, Walmart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justo Vargas v. Warden Allenwood FCI
as 26-2125
Plaintiff:
JUSTO VARGAS
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
