Cases 11 - 20 of 33
SMITH v. SAUL
as 4:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
JAMIE K. SMITH
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TRUELOVE v. ALVEY et al
as 3:2021cv00015
Defendant:
KATHY A. ALVEY, TYLER VANHOOSIER, BENJAMIN L. WEAVER and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN R. TRUELOVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00459
Plaintiff:
MELISSA K. SMITH
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KELLOGG et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv01181
Defendant:
KURSTEN SHANKS, ANA MARIE SMITH, ANNAMARIE K. SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
EDA KELLOGG and GENE KELLOGG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01948
Plaintiff:
LARRY K. SMITH
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colombini et al v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jerry W. Kittle, Martin L. Heifner, Carisa A. Snyder and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00282
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sabrina K. Smith
Undetermined:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edwards v. Griffin et al
as 3:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
Scottie R. Edwards
Defendant:
Kathy Griffin, William K. Smith, Joyce Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2018cv00484
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE R. EDWARDS
Defendant:
KATHY GRIFFIN, WILLIAM MARTIN, JOYCE RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARVEL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00035
Assistant Warden:
KEITH HARTZELL
Respondent:
A. HOOKER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Appeal Review Officer:
J. LYTTLE
Petitioner:
KYLE MARVEL
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Warden:
BRIAN K. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
