Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dupreme v. Pisani et al
as 3:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Kasaun Dupreme Moales and Kasaun Dupreme
Defendant:
R. J. Pisani, J. M. Kranyak, K. P. Hilliard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Karp et al
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rogers v. Middletown et al
as 3:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Rogers
Defendant:
City of Middletown, Retired Chief of Police William McKenna, Sergeant Brian White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Connell et al
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Connell, C. Gibbs, Radar Model Stalker Dual and others
Alicea v. Yang et al
as 3:2021cv01638
Plaintiff:
Maria Mercedes Alicea
Defendant:
David Haung Yang, Shideh Imanian Parsa, Robben Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US Bank Trust, N.A. v. Malec et al
as 3:2021cv01280
Defendant:
Stephen J. Malec, Keeley Malec, Stephen K. Malec, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
US Bank Trust Association and US Bank Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
