Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Electronic Games, Inc., et al v. The Puerto Rico Tourism Company, et al
as 3:2020cv01478
Plaintiff:
Antonio Colon Santiago, Ramon Rivera Figueroa, C & K ENTERTAINMENT, CORP. and others
Defendant:
THE GAMING COMMISION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF PUERTO RICO, THE PUERTO RICO TOURISM COMPANY and The Gaming Commission of The Government of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmelo v. Walgreens Pharmacy of 999 Munoz Rivera Ave in Rio Piedras et al
as 3:2016cv01899
Plaintiff:
Perez Morales Carmelo
Defendant:
Walgreens Pharmacy of 999 Munoz Rivera Ave in Rio Piedras, Caldero Lopez Jose L., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Falero-Rivera v. Ruiz et al
as 3:2013cv01859
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Falero-Rivera
Defendant:
Kathleen Ruiz, Iris Hernandez, Raquel Maisonet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marrero Marrero v. Shinseki et al
as 3:2012cv01954
Plaintiff:
Carmen Marrero Marrero
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki and Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321 Plant Variety Protection Act
Carrasco v. Shinseki
as 3:2012cv01736
Plaintiff:
Alberto Carrasco
Defendant:
Eric K Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
