Cases 31 - 40 of 594
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robinson v. Escorza et al
as 5:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
V. Escorza, K. Garza and Alamo Heights Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robelle v. Sams Club
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Hailu K Robelle
Defendant:
Sams Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Simpson v. Brandon et al
as 4:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Richard Bryan Simpson
Defendant:
Thomas S. Brandon, Jr., Robert A Simon, Rebecca K. Eaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kreb v. Integra Aviation, LLC. et al
as 2:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Robert Kreb
Defendant:
Integra Aviation, LLC. doing business as Apollo Med Flight, Apollo Med Flight LLC., Panavia Air Taxi, LLC doing business as Haven Aero, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robelle v. Sams Club
as 3:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Hailu K Robelle
Defendant:
Sams Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams v. Select Energy Services, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Adams
Defendant:
Select Energy Services, Inc. d/b/a Tidal Logistics and Select Energy Services, Inc. doing business as Tidal Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Discrimination
Montez v. Pulliam
as 5:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant:
Jason K. Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
