Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Stephens v Title Max
as 2:2023cv00359
Defendant:
Title Max and TMX
Plaintiff:
K L Stevens and K L Stephens
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nair et al v. Toth et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Defendant:
John Doe, Alex Toth, Paul Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Jayakumar Sundaran Nair, Rajakumari Susheelkumar, Jayakrishnan Krishnan Nair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In the Guardianship of: Omana Thankamma
as 2:2023cv00190
Petitioner:
Channa Copeland
Respondent:
Jayakrishnan K Nair
In Re:
Omana Thankamma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Foss v. King County et al
as 2:2022cv01728
Plaintiff:
MAGDALENA KRISTIN FOSS and Magdalena K Foss
Defendant:
King County, City of Monroe, Paul Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
