Cases 41 - 50 of 420
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Patent Armory Inc. v. K-array
as 6:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
K-array
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Monument Peak Ventures, LLC v. Hanwha Vision Co., Ltd. f/k/a Hanwha Techwin Co., Ltd.
as 6:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Monument Peak Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Hanwha Vision Co., Ltd. f/k/a Hanwha Techwin Co., Ltd., Hanwha Vision Co., Ltd. and Hanwha Techwin Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04401
Plaintiff:
Dyson Technology Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Bonacell Store, Bonadget Store and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
New Millennium Software International, L.L.C. v. Phantom Auto Inc.
as 3:2023cv03278
Plaintiff:
New Millennium Software International, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Phantom Auto Inc. f/k/a Steeringz, Inc., Phantom Auto Inc. and Steeringz, Inc.
Interested Party:
Starship Technologies, Inc. and Starship Technologies OU
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Voesh Corporation v. J & K Beauty Supply, LLC
as 4:2023cv02340
Plaintiff:
Voesh Corporation
Defendant:
J & K Beauty Supply, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
