Cases 41 - 50 of 501
Gary K. Fenton v. Empower Retirement, LLC
as 2:2021cv02563
Plaintiff:
Gary K Fenton and Gary K. Fenton
Defendant:
Empower Retirement, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Davis (ID 06598) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2021cv03247
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Reno, County of, Derek Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRoberts v. Overland Park, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2021cv02470
Plaintiff:
Shauna McRoberts
Defendant:
Overland Park, Kansas, City of, Frank Donchez, Kendrick Rosas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Charbonneau et al v. K. Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02464
Plaintiff:
Tristan Charbonneau and Rene Keller
Defendant:
K. Construction, Inc. and American Buildings Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03204
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader and Craig James Strader
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sam A. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis (ID 06598) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2021cv03205
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Daniel L. Schnurr, Debra K. Lundry, Jennifer J. Davisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rumford v. High Choice Feeders, LLC et al.
as 6:2021cv01192
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Rumford and Tyrone L. Rumford
Defendant:
High Choice Feeders, LLC, High Choice Cattle, LLC, High Choice Grain, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matthews (ID 105040) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2021cv03171
Petitioner:
Joshua K. Matthews
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
