Cases 41 - 50 of 304
WHITFIELD v. ECHO GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04917
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ECHO GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC., DOUGLAS R WAGGONER, WILLIAM M FARROW, III and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
JUSTICE, II v. THE EXONE COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv04607
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
THE EXONE COMPANY, S. KENT ROCKWELL, JOHN HARTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
HOPKINS v. SANDERSON FARMS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04389
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
SANDERSON FARMS, INC., FRED BANKS, JR., DAVID BARKSDALE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CAMPANELLA v. THE EXONE COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv01302
Plaintiff:
PIETRO CAMPANELLA
Defendant:
THE EXONE COMPANY, S. KENT ROCKWELL, JOHN HARTNER and others
KONG v. THE EXONE COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv04165
Plaintiff:
ZHAOQUN KONG
Defendant:
THE EXONE COMPANY, JOHN F. HARTNER, S. KENT ROCKWELL and others
HOPKINS v. WELBILT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04053
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
WELBILT, INC., CYNTHIA M EGNOTOVICH, DINO J BIANCO and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. SELECT BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04033
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
SELECT BANCORP, INC., J GARY CICCONE, JAMES H GLEN, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. NEW SENIOR INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03832
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
NEW SENIOR INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., FRANCES ALDRICH SEVILLA-SACASA, SUSAN GIVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
FAILLE JR. v. ADAPTHEALTH CORP. F/K/A DFB HEALTHCARE ACQUISITIONS CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv03382
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES FAILLE JR.
Defendant:
ADAPTHEALTH CORP. F/K/A DFB HEALTHCARE ACQUISITIONS CORP., LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
