Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Velasquez v. Martin, et al.
as 1:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ariel O. Velasquez
Defendant:
Warden Daniel Martin, Major/Chief Michael Nessinger, Sergeant A Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinkerton v. Kettle
as 1:2019cv00500
Defendant:
Mathew Kettle
Plaintiff:
Jamal K. Pinkerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Defendant:
Jonathan Horton, M 4307 Nelligan, David D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Respondent:
Ronald D Vitiello, M 4307 Nelligan, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nickerson v. Providence Plantation et al
as 1:2019cv00030
Defendant:
Billie-Jo Gallagher, City of Cranston, Fred Specht and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Nickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Murphy v. Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00203
Plaintiff:
Sean Murphy
Defendant:
Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation , Brian K. Murphy , AVCORR Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Krollman et al
as 1:2013cv00717
Plaintiff:
Charles Randall
Defendant:
John C Krollman, AT Wall, Haiban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotto v. Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jose Cotto
Defendant:
Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation, AVCORR Management, LLC, MVF Consulting LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
