Cases 21 - 30 of 1,853
Brown v. Green et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Monta Brown
Defendant:
Lieutenant T. Green, Sergeant K. Daughtry, Sergeant J. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. Kang et al
as 1:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
John K. Spalding
Defendant:
Je Suk Kang and Dianne Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Antonio Wilson
Defendant:
D. Watson, K. Knolls, Ms. Gomes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Meguire v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Virginia K. Meguire
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
James L. Brown
Respondent:
K. Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
