Cases 1 - 10 of 966
B. et al v. The Providential Health and Services Health and Welfare Plan
as 2:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Robert B., Kara B. and K. B.
Defendant:
The Providence Health and Services Health and Welfare Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dahlstrom v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00641
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr, United States of America, Merrick B Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Raju AT Dahlstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nanez v. Sapp et al
as 3:2024cv05293
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dale Nanez
Defendant:
Penelope Sapp, Genie Elton, K. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Krikac v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Susan K Krikac
Defendant:
Unum Life Ins. Co. of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Patel v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Raj K Patel
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ragland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05213
Plaintiff:
Malinda K Ragland
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Amber K Roberts and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Korman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05086
Plaintiff:
Bunny K Korman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
