Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Love v. Harvanek
as 5:2024cv00257
Petitioner: Lonnie Love
Respondent: Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coker v. Stitt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00147
Plaintiff: David Wayne Coker
Defendant: Kevin Stitt, Kameron Harvanek, Matthew Sinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanwoudenberg v. Harvanek
as 4:2023cv00321
Petitioner: Edward John Vanwoudenberg
Respondent: Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochlin v. Harvanek
as 5:2023cv00522
Petitioner: David Christopher Cochlin
Respondent: Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Harvanek
as 23-5036
Petitioner / Appellant: KEITH EARL ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee: KAMERON HARVANEK
Musonda v. Harvanek We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00030
Petitioner: Lubuto Musonda
Respondent: Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rushing v. Harvanek We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00949
Petitioner: Jerry Rushing
Respondent: Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff: Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant: James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rushing v. Harvanek We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00394
Respondent: Kameron Harvanek
Petitioner: Thorsten Gunter Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Womble v. Harvanek
as 19-7051
Defendant / Appellee: KAMERON HARVANEK
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH Z. WOMBLE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?