Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Kane Construction, LLC v. CMC9 Investments, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff: Kane Construction, LLC
Defendant: CMC9 Investments, Inc., Christopher Combs and Michelle C. Combs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00242
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Anderson v. Barr et al
as 3:2019cv00786
Defendant: Interim Assistant Thomas R. Kane, Attorney General William Barr, Interim Director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Estate of Mary Kathryn Kane Meltz v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00428
Defendant: T;, C;, U; and others
Plaintiff: Estate of Mary Kathryn Kane Meltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Koh v. Kane et al
as 5:2017cv00039
Plaintiff: Junne Koh
Defendant: Thomas Kane and Unknown Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koh v. Kane et al
as 5:2017cv00036
Plaintiff: Junne Koh
Defendant: Thomas Kane and Unknown Guerrero, Ms.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koh v. Faust et al
as 5:2017cv00027
Plaintiff: Junne Koh
Defendant: Unknown Faust and Thomas Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonds v. Natal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00109
Plaintiff: Steven Earl Bonds
Defendant: Unknown Natal, C. Samuels, Jr. and Thomas Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Blackman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00752
Plaintiff: Jesse Jackson
Defendant: B.E. Blackman, C. Curry, Director of B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?