Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALDEN LEEDS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv07326
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALDEN LEEDS, INC., ALLIANCE CHEMICAL, INC., ARKEMA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Intervenor:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION and PASSAIC VALLEY SEWERAGE COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nauden v. KAO USA Inc.
as 1:2018cv01134
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Nauden, Jr.
Defendant:
KAO USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michaelis v. Kao USA, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00873
Defendant:
Kao USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kristy Michaelis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kao Kabushiki Kaisha et al v. Amar Meshhur Wholesale et al
as 1:2017cv09419
Plaintiff:
Kao Kabushiki Kaisha and Kao USA Inc.
Defendant:
Amar Meshhur Wholesale, Amar Salem and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
KAO KABUSHIKI KAISHA et al v. SAMI KHALES
as 2:2017cv12312
Plaintiff:
KAO KABUSHIKI KAISHA and KAO USA INC.
Defendant:
SAMI KHALES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Kao Kabushiki Kaisha et al v. Khales
as 1:2017cv04584
Plaintiff:
Kao Kabushiki Kaisha and Kao USA Inc.
Defendant:
Sami Khales
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
