Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 913
Raies et al.
as 5:2024cv00885
Plaintiff: Paul Raies and Karen Raies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schottelkotte v. Hard Rock Casino Cincinnati, LLC
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff: Karen Schottelkotte
Defendant: Hard Rock Casino Cincinnati, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harrison v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02229
Plaintiff: Karen Harrison
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party: State of Ohio
Plaintiff: Antonio Henderson
Defendant: Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johns v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01617
Plaintiff: Karen Johns
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garner et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01610
Plaintiff: Mark Garner and Karen Hill
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burgess v. Grace et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff: Kren/Karen Y Burgess
Defendant: Mr. Grace, Ms. Murry, Mr. August and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cookson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01403
Plaintiff: Karen Cookson
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: Joshua Taper
Defendant: Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Senodenos et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01334
Plaintiff: Michael Senodenos and Karen Senodenos
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?