Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Briggs et al v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv40162
Plaintiff:
Leonard Briggs , George Skinder , Louis Markham and others
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Carol Higgins O'Brien, Katherine A. Chmiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Briggs et al v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 4:2015cv40162
Plaintiff:
Leonard Briggs , George Skinder , Louis Markham and others
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Carol Higgins O'Brien, Katherine A. Chmiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Bohannon v. Wessell et al
as 4:2014cv40176
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannon
Defendant:
Ernest Wessell, James O'Leary, Robert Vinal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reis v. Spectrum Health Systems, Inc., et al
as 13-1482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX REIS, a/k/a Viktor Rolf Klein
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECTRUM HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., ERYN BURDETT, LAURA SIEBERT and others
LeBaron v. Meal Mart, et al
as 13-1073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN MARQUIS LEBARON
Defendant - Appellee:
MEAL MART, MEAL MART OWNERS, UNKNOWN MEAL MART EMPLOYEES and others
Interested Party:
DARRON J. SHEROKOW, KEVIN ASHBY, NICHOLAS BASEY and others
Reis v. Spectrum Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv12275
Plaintiff:
Alex Reis
Defendant:
Spectrum Health Systems, Inc., Eryn Burdett, Laura Siebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Spencer et al
as 1:2012cv12154
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz
Defendant:
Luis S. Spencer, Peter A Pepper. Jr, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeBaron v. Meal Mart et al
as 1:2012cv11134
Plaintiff:
Nathan Marquis LeBaron
Defendant:
Meal Mart, Meal Mart Owners, Unknown Meal Mart Employees and others
Movant:
Darron J. Sherokow, Keith Ashby, Nicholus Basey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
