Cases 1 - 10 of 16
ARMSTEAD v. GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2018cv02149
Defendant:
MARANDET, WEXFORD HEALTH CARE, KATHY GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN ARMSTEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2018cv00484
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE R. EDWARDS
Defendant:
KATHY GRIFFIN, WILLIAM MARTIN, JOYCE RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2017cv01348
Respondent:
KATHY GRIFFIN
Petitioner:
GEORGE KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TOPP v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2017cv01265
Respondent:
KATHY GRIFFIN
Petitioner:
BRAD TOPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LATTIMORE v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2016cv03489
Respondent:
KATHY GRIFFIN
Petitioner:
JAMES L. LATTIMORE
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EDMONDS v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2016cv01817
Petitioner:
JOHNNY EDMONDS
Respondent:
KATHY GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCHREIBER v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2016cv01506
Respondent:
KATHY GRIFFIN
Petitioner:
DAVID SCHREIBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EASTWOOD v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2016cv00204
Petitioner:
ROBERT E. EASTWOOD
Respondent:
KATHY GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANDIS v. GRIFFIN
as 2:2015cv00319
Respondent:
KATHY GRIFFIN
Petitioner:
MAXWELL LANDIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LASHBROOK v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2015cv00206
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RICHARD BROWN, GRACE COLLEGE & THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, SUPERINTENDENT KATHY GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL K. LASHBROOK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
