Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Daryl Burnett, Jr. v. Keith Butts, et al
as 22-1198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL K. BURNETT, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH BUTTS, T. THOMPSON, Hearing Officer Disciplinary and SARAH HAEFNER, Appeal Review Officer
Daryl Burnett, Jr. v. Keith Butts, et al
as 22-1254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL K. BURNETT, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH BUTTS, T. THOMPSON, Hearing Officer Disciplinary and SARAH HAEFNER, Appeal Review Officer
Donald Jackson v. Robert Carter, et al
as 21-1711
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. SMITH, NEAL FETZ, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD L. JACKSON
Byron Hubbard v. Indiana Parole Board
as 20-3527
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH BUTTS and INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Petitioner / Appellant:
BYRON HUBBARD
Leonard Thomas v. Jack Hendrix, et al
as 19-2784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent, Westville Correctional Facility, VICKI E. BURDINE, Psychiatrist, JACK HENDRIX, Director of Classification and others
Wendell Brown v. Marion County Superior Court, et al
as 19-2799
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER SMITH, in official and private capacities, MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, MAJOR DAVIS, in official and private capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDELL BROWN, also known as Menes Ankh El
Menes Ankh El v. Keith Butts
as 19-2150
Petitioner / Appellant:
WENDELL BROWN, also known as Menes Ankh El
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH BUTTS
Mark Hughes v. Robert Carter, et al
as 19-1967
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, Comm., KEITH BUTTS, Warden, DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK S. HUGHES
David Paterson v. Keith Butts
as 19-2058
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PATERSON
Menes Ankh-El v. Robert Carter, et al
as 19-1969
Appellee:
MS. OWENS and JENNIFER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. FETZ, KEITH BUTTS, ROBERT CARTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDELL BROWN, also known as MENES ANKH-EL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
