Cases 81 - 90 of 99
CROCKETT v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2013cv01840
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, DICK, DUNN and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CROCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Galen Freeman v. Keith Butt
as 13-3579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GALEN FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH BUTTS
VANCLEAVE v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2013cv01586
Defendant:
ARAMARK, BARNES, ROBERT BURNS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL K. VANCLEAVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Lacy v. State of Indiana, et al
as 13-3173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD LACY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF INDIANA, MIKE PENCE, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Indiana, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
ECHOLS v. BUTTS et al
as 2:2013cv00249
Defendant:
DICK BROWN, KEITH BUTTS, CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, PCF/IR and others
Plaintiff:
CARL A. ECHOLS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENSON v. COMMISSIONER et al
as 1:2013cv01020
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, CURTIS BYNUM, COMMISSIONER and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY G. HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEABROOKS v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2013cv00600
Defendant:
Facility Program Dir ANDY BEGUHN, Warden KEITH BUTTS, ASR J FRENCH and others
Plaintiff:
KEREL L SEABROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2013cv00156
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS and MICHAEL ZENK
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAUL-BEY v. BRUBAKER et al
as 1:2013cv00075
Defendant:
JANE BRUBAKER, KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
ENGAI MAUL-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard Thomas v. Keith Butts, et al
as 12-2902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH BUTTS, WILLIAM E. WOLFE, VANESSA G. SUFFOLETTA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
