Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 158
Jenkins v. Correctional Medical Group Companies et al
as 2:2019cv00841
Defendant: FNU Vaughan, Sgt. Lepe, Michelle Olubode and others
Plaintiff: Shermykael Jenkins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atum-Rayay v. Wilcher et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00309
Defendant: Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Joe Roesch, Tammie Mosley and others
Plaintiff: RaHarrakte Sahu Atum-Rayay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 7:2019cv00165
Defendant: BETH C GREENE, JONI B PARKER, ELIZABETH CHESSER CLEVELAND and others
Plaintiff: DESMOND LAMONT STOKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Starling et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00430
Defendant: Sharron Marshall, A. Powell, Asst. Warden Lane and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Green
as 1:2019cv00260
Plaintiff: Aaron Levi Kelley
Defendant: Dennis Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Estes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00194
Respondent: Warden Dewayne Estes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner: Robert W. Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murzike v. Kelley et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Defendant: C/O Braswell, C/O John Doe and Officer J. D. Kelley
Plaintiff: James T. Murzike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY v. BOWEN
as 1:2018cv00213
Respondent: Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Petitioner: DAVID CHRIS KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLEY v. BOWEN
as 5:2018cv00401
Respondent: WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN
Petitioner: DAVID CHRIS KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daker v. Dozier et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv00073
Defendant: Warden Jack Koon, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Lisa Fountain and others
Plaintiff: Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?