Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Palmer v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Palmer and Richard Palmer
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Kelley Christopher, Dr. Timothy Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kelley v. Yalobosha County MS Sherriff's Dept et al
as 3:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
Yalobosha County MS Sherriff's Dept, Lloyd Defer, Steve Story and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Banks
as 3:2011cv00111
Petitioner:
Daniel G. Kelley
Respondent:
Jacqueline Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QBE Insurance Corporation v. Marascalco Dermatology Clinic, Inc., et al
as 3:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
QBE Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Marascalco Dermatology Clinic, Inc., John D. Marascalco, MD,PA, Mark C. Kelley, D.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc00005
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company, Inc., PCI and others
Receiver:
Douglas A. Kelley
Ellis v. McIntyre et al
as 4:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Kathryn McIntyre, Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scruggs v. McIntyre et al
as 4:2008cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ricky Scruggs
Defendant:
Kathryn McIntyre, Christopher Epps and Lawrence Kelley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benson v. Gammage et al
as 3:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kelley Benson and Kelley Benson
Defendant:
Don Gammage, Sherry Driver and Steve Gurley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
