Cases 41 - 50 of 671
Rickenbacker v. John Doe No. 1
as 22-267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Rickenbacker
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2, John Doe No. 3 and others
McCollum v. Rochester Psychiatric Center et al
as 6:2022cv06057
Plaintiff:
Darius McCollum
Defendant:
Rochester Psychiatric Center, Jannette Wilson, Benita Zanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burrell v. Durkin et al
as 9:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Charlie Durkin, King, D. Lashway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harnett v. Russel
as 1:2022cv00589
Petitioner:
Kelly Harnett
Respondent:
Eileen Russel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harnett v. Russel
as 1:2022cv00610
Petitioner:
Kelly Harnett
Respondent:
Eileen Russel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wyatt v. Loving et al
as 1:2021cv10447
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Jr.
Defendant:
Kelly Loving, State of Texas System Government and Dallas Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Gantner et al
as 9:2021cv01257
Plaintiff:
Germaine Manuel Aybar Garcia
Defendant:
Mary Ann Gantner, Daniel W. Kelly, Roger Sagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Garland et al
as 9:2021cv01255
Plaintiff:
Germaine Manuel Aybar Garcia
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Congress, Roger Sagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Gantner et al
as 1:2021cv06423
Plaintiff:
Germaine Manuel Aybar Garcia
Defendant:
Mary Ann Gantner, Daniel W. Kelly, Roger Sagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Carter et al
as 1:2021cv08992
Plaintiff:
Tyrefe Kelly
Defendant:
Warden Carter, Captain Guerra, Capt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
