Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ken Cameron, et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-11907
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEN CAMERON and MICHELLE CAMERON
Defendant - Appellee: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Type: Contract Insurance
Cameron et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv21704
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Petitioner: Ken Cameron and Michelle Cameron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
JACKSON v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2015cv06719
Petitioner: JOHN JACKSON
Respondent: KEN CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LYBARGER v. CAMERON
as 3:2015cv00259
Petitioner: ERIK LYBARGER
Respondent: KEN CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SPADA v. CAMERON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00202
Petitioner: ZACHARY THOMAS SPADA
Respondent: KEN CAMERON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and ERIE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KNAUSS v. CAMERON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv04320
Petitioner: JOSEPH KNAUSS
Respondent: KEN CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LYBARGER v. CAMERON
as 3:2015cv00089
Petitioner: ERIK LYBARGER
Respondent: KEN CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LYBARGER v. CAMERON
as 3:2014cv00208
Petitioner: ERIK LYBARGER
Respondent: KEN CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DANDAR v. CAMERON et al
as 1:2014cv00168
Petitioner: RON DANDAR
Respondent: KEN CAMERON, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and D.A. ERIE OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LYBARGER v. CAMERON
as 3:2014cv00119
Petitioner: ERIK LYBARGER
Respondent: KEN CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?