Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Custis v. Exmore Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Exmore Police Department, Adam Zieger, Jonathan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Rockingham-Harrisonburg Regional Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
William O. Murray, III
Defendant:
Rockingham-Harrisonburg Regional Jail, Dep. Yardley, Dep. Lassiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Yardley et al
as 7:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
William O. Murray, III
Defendant:
Dep. Yardley, Dep. Lassiter, Dep. Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Haskins et al
as 7:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Kennedy
Defendant:
Petra Haskins, Sgt James and Capt Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Dept. of Corrections
as 7:2023cv00803
Petitioner:
Carl Ray Kennedy
Respondent:
Dept. Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2023cv00635
Petitioner:
Carl Ray Kennedy
Respondent:
Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Genworth Financial Inc.
as 3:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Darlene Kennedy
Defendant:
Genworth Financial Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Whitfield v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
David M. Whitfield
Defendant:
Sgt Artis, Ches. Jail Medical Staff, Sgt Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
