Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Kenneth Sierra v. Director for the Department of, et al
as 20-15229
Defendant / Appellee:
ALVAREZ, CNA, J. GIGER, Appeals Coordinator, CALLAS, CNA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH A. SIERRA
(PC) Sierra v. CDCR Director et al
as 2:2017cv02611
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan Sierra
Defendant:
M. Veras, L. Davis, Hubble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Sierra v. Director for the Dept of Corr, et al
as 17-16055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH A. SIERRA
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, JENNIFER BERETTO, A. ADAMS, Chief Medical Executive and others
Sierra v. Director of CDCR et al
as 2:2016cv01067
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan Sierra
Defendant:
Director of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jennifer Beretto, A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sierra v. Director of CDCR et al
as 4:2016cv02032
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan Sierra
Defendant:
Director of CDCR, Jennifer Beretto, A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Sierra v. Dr. Moon, et al
as 12-16631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH A. SIERRA
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. MOON, DR. KIM, DR. CLARK and others
Kenneth Sierra v. Woodford, et al
as 11-17049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH A. SIERRA
Defendant - Appellee:
WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, ADAMS, Warden at Corcoran State Prison, ROSENTHAL, Education Library at Corcoran State Prison and others
Kenneth Sierra v. McGuiness, et al
as 11-17052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH A. SIERRA
Defendant - Appellee:
MCGUINESS, Chief Medical Officer, CLARK, Doctor, WANG, Doctor and others
Kenneth Sierra v. C. Terhune
as 11-17046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH A. SIERRA
Defendant - Appellee:
C. A. TERHUNE
Sierra v. Moon et al
as 1:2011cv01214
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan Sierra
Defendant:
Moon, Kim, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
