Cases 11 - 20 of 34
White v. Brokaw et al
as 9:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Larry A. White
Defendant:
Matthew Brokaw, Steven Fleshman, Bryan Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Corley v. Nelson
as 0:2022cv04082
Petitioner:
Stephen Corley
Respondent:
Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Stirling et al
as 1:2022cv03690
Petitioner:
Ebon Roberts
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel v. Nelson
as 9:2022cv03285
Petitioner:
Keith Daniel
Respondent:
Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Nelson
as 4:2022cv03264
Petitioner:
Ronnie Martin
Respondent:
Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gamble v. Nelson et al
as 4:2022cv02341
Plaintiff:
Charles Gamble and Charles Edward Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Nelson, Warden Tonya James, Mr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stackhouse, Jr. v. Nelson
as 2:2022cv01863
Petitioner:
Edward W. Stackhouse, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Nelson et al
as 8:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
Dantlee A. Smith
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Nelson, Cpt. Tony Vela, Major Kenneth Greggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cannon v. Nelson
as 1:2022cv01066
Petitioner:
Donetelle D. Cannon
Respondent:
Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Nelson
as 2:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Doni Terrele Anderson
Respondent:
Mr. Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
