Cases 1 - 10 of 185
Wuethrich v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65428
Plaintiff:
Kent Wuethrich
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hardymon v. Kent et al.
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Shane J Hardymon
Defendant:
Scott Kent and Michael P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kent v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kent
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. City of Port Clinton et al.
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Kent D. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Port Clinton, Michael Snider, Tracy Colston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hull v. Yost et al
as 2:2023cv03940
Plaintiff:
Seain C. Hull
Defendant:
David Yost, Matthew Crall, Scott Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughlin v. E. Slye Holdings LLC et al.
as 1:2023cv02232
Plaintiff:
Kristian M. McLaughlin
Defendant:
E. Slye Holdings LLC doing business as ES Logistics and Kent M. Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Edelstein et al v. Flottman et al
as 1:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edelstein and S. E.
Defendant:
S. E., a Minor, Judge Ann Flottman, Magistrate Craig Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodrich v. City of Marion, Ohio et al.
as 3:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
Donald Goodrich
Defendant:
City of Marion, Ohio, Austin Ray, Nicholas Kalb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Handy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03656
Plaintiff:
Kent Handy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huskey v. City of Port Clinton, Ohio et al.
as 3:2023cv01910
Plaintiff:
Rebekah Huskey
Defendant:
City of Port Clinton, Ohio and Kent Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
