Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Charles Jones v. Kent County, MI, et al
as 23-1866
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES JONES, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Wade Jones
Defendant:
KENT COUNTY, MI, jointly and severally
Defendant / Appellant:
NURSE MELISSA FURNACE, jointly and severally, NURSE CHAD RICHARD GOETTERMAN, jointly and severally and NURSE JAMES AUGUST MOLLO, jointly and severally
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor:
TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Deshawn Anderson-Santos v. Kent County, MI, et al
as 23-1259
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DESHAWN ANDERSON-SANTOS
Defendant:
KENT COUNTY, MI
Defendant / Appellant:
DEREK LESHAN, in his individual and official capacity
Frederick Grainger, Jr. v. Ottawa County, MI, et al
as 23-1230
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR.
Intervenor:
BRIAN BEHOVITZ
Defendant / Appellee:
OTTAWA COUNTY, MI, by its Board of Commissioners, AMANDA PRICE, in her individual and official capacity, BRADLEY SLAGH, in his individual capacity and others
Harold Staffney v. Stephen Cole, et al
as 23-1149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD STAFFNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN D. COHLE, BLODGETT MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, KENNETH KOOLSTRA and others
Lonnie Olmetti v. Kent County, MI, et al
as 22-1834
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LONNIE OLMETTI
Defendant:
KENT COUNTY, MI
Defendant / Appellant:
TYLER KING, in his individual and official capacity and JUSTIN LINSEA, in his individual and official capacity
David Sper v. Kent County, MI, et al
as 21-2989
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID SPER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jonathan Sper
Defendant / Appellant:
KENT COUNTY, MI, a Municipal Corporation, LAWRENCE A. STELMA, In his individual capacity, MICHELLE LAJOYE-YOUNG, In her individual capacity and others
Ricardo Rosario v. Health Care (MDOC), et al
as 20-1646
Defendant:
HEALTH CARE (MDOC)
Defendant / Appellee:
KENT COUNTY, MI, UNKNOWN PARTY #3, Health Care Provider, KENT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO CORA ROSARIO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
