Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Kenyon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03861
Plaintiff:
James F Kenyon
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kenyon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02688
Plaintiff:
Nanette Kenyon
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ahron Williams
Defendant:
Warden Ron Erdos, C/O Kenyon, U.M. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenyon v. Union Home Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2021cv01426
Plaintiff:
Michael Kenyon
Defendant:
Union Home Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Denison University et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy Number W2205F200301 et al
as 2:2021cv01010
Defendant:
Evanston Insurance Company, Homeland Insurance Company of New York, Ace American Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ohio Wesleyan University, Kenyon College, Denison University and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04972
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United Home Mortgage Corp. v. Kenyon
as 1:2020cv02016
Plaintiff:
United Home Mortgage Corp.
Defendant:
Michael Kenyon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khan v. Canonical USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Ekbal Khan
Defendant:
Canonical USA, Inc., Michael Kress, Christopher Kenyon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
