Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hampton v. Woodmen et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Jonathan Woodmen, Kerry Corass, Katholyn Runnels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahle v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00090
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Joyce Kerri Mahle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hersh v. Gernat-Cheyete et al
as 3:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
John A. Hersh
Defendant:
Rachel K. Gernat-Cheyete, Sherry L. Ferno, Terisia K. Chleborad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd et al v. MTC Financial Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Frederick C. Boyd and Kerry M. Boyd
Defendant:
MTC Financial Inc. and RTED America LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. Kerry et al
as 3:2016cv00269
Plaintiff:
John Francis Mathis, Sr.
Defendant:
John F Kerry, Marcus Micheli, Jahna Lindemuth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Alaska v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 4:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
State of Alaska
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Cameron F. Kerry and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Thomas v. State of Alaska District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
State of Alaska District Attorney's Office, Richard Allen, Trina Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. State of Alaska District Attorneys Office Palmer AK et al
as 3:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
State of Alaska District Attorney's Office, Palmer, AK, Richard Allen, Trina Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. District Attorneys Office Palmer AK. et al
as 3:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office Palmer AK., Richard Allen, Trina Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
