Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Elliot v. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02966
Plaintiff:
Lillian Elliot
Defendant:
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05208
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Willis-Albrigo et al v. Motts, LLP et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Laura Willis-Albrigo and Tiffany Taylor
Defendant:
Motts, LLP and Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dailey v. A&W Concentrate Company et al
as 4:2020cv02732
Defendant:
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and A&W Concentrate Company
Plaintiff:
Steve Dailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Fidel Escobedo et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv06828
Plaintiff:
Fidel Escobedo, Alexandra Escobedo, Mary Chavez and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Carlos Botello-Ortega, Consolidated Disposal Services, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
