Cases 31 - 40 of 112
HARDISON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARDISON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, MATT LEOHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENLEE VS. HENDRIX ET AL.
as 2:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GREENLEE
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, FRANK VANIHEL, DICK BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Howard Garrett
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Executive Director RICHARD BROWN, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDISON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARDISON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, MATT LEOHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael T. Robinson v. Richard Brown, et al
as 22-1105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, FRANK LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN GILMORE and others
GLENN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
VICTOR GLENN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORAN v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
MILES TORAN
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL, FRANK LITTLEJOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00468
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., BRUCE LEMMONS, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Crouch v. Richard Brown, et al
as 21-2422
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY CROUCH
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, KEVIN GILMORE, JERRY SNYDER and others
HARRIS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2021cv00218
Defendant:
HANCOCK, DICK BROWN, FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
