Cases 1 - 10 of 35
WICK v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05632
Petitioner:
KEVIN J. WICK
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FERRARA v. O'TOOLE et al
as 2:2023cv21806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PHILIP FERRARA
Cross Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE TOWN COUNCIL and KEVIN J. O'TOOLE
Defendant:
PETER TANELLA, THOMAS TUCCI, CEDAR GROVE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALLACE v. IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv03582
Plaintiff:
ALLYSON WALLACE
Defendant:
IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, KEVIN J. O'CONNER and LUM, DRASCO & POSITAN LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
WOODS v. WARDEN, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON
as 1:2022cv06136
Petitioner:
KEVIN J. WOODS
Respondent:
WARDEN, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WALLACE v. IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv02191
Plaintiff:
ALLYSON WALLACE
Defendant:
IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, KEVIN J. O'CONNER and LUM, DRASCO & POSITAN LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Me et al v. United States et al
as 2:2021cv19396
Plaintiff:
Jane Me, Jane Me1 and JON ROE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U.S. DHS, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OSBORN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2021cv12475
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. OSBORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
POSYTON, III v. TOWNSHIP OF WESTFIELD et al
as 2:2019cv19013
Defendant:
KEVIN J. O'KEEFE, DAVID C. WAYMAN, GOV. DONALD T. DIFRANCESCO and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
