Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 19-55926
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW P. DONOVAN, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, RICHARD V. SPENCER, Secretary, Department of the Navy, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
Charleston Dacoff v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 19-55897
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, DAVID MARIN, in his official capacity as Los Angeles Field Office Director, Office of Detention and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, in his official capacity as Warden of the Adelanto Detention Facility and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLESTON EDWARD DACOFF
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 19-16487
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROFESSORS OF IMMIGRATION LAW, STATE OF ARIZONA and IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Jian Wang v. Kevin K. McAleenan et al
as 2:2019cv06558
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Robert E Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Jian Wang
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Jose Bello Reyes v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 19-16441
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK MORGAN, Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ERIK BONNAR, Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE OMAR BELLO REYES
Amicus Curiae:
PEN AMERICA
Cloud9 Esports, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2019cv05945
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II and others
Petitioner:
Director Kathy BARAN, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Acting Secretary Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
Cloud9 Esports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16336
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Amicus Curiae:
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FEDERAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE, DUANE MORELY COX, TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION and others
Yolany Padilla, et al v. ICE, et al
as 19-35565
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID SHINN, Warden, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, MARC J. MOORE, Seattle Field Office Director, ICE and others
Defendant:
JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of CBP, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, FKA Department of Social Services, MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Deputy Director of ICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IBIS GUZMAN, BLANCA ORANTES, BALTAZAR VASQUEZ and others
Doe v. McAleenan et al
as 4:2019cv03852
Defendant:
Kevin K. McAleenan, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sierra Club, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16300
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER COMMUNITIES COALITION
Amicus Curiae:
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SABINE DURDEN, DON ROSENBERG, BRIAN McCANN, JUDY ZEITO, MAUREEN MULRONEY, MAUREEN LAQUERRE, DENNIS BIXBY, Angel Families, ANDY BARR, U.S. Representative and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
