Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Weingrad v. Keyes (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ari P. Weingrad
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sharma v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Sohrab Sharma
Defendant:
Colette Peters and W D Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pelayo v. Keyes (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bonilla Pelayo
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guevara v. Keyes (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Guevara
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ledford v. Tyler Perry Studio's et al
as 1:2023cv05472
Plaintiff:
Larry Lamont Ledford
Defendant:
Tyler Perry Studio's, Christian Keyes and Law Office of Dayna Thomas Cook, Esq LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
KEYES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34299
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KEYES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KEYES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28811
Plaintiff:
GARY KEYES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KEYES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25120
Plaintiff:
BRANDON KEYES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KEYES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11487
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE KEYES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KEYES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05957
Plaintiff:
MARCUS KEYES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
