Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lonnell Wideman v. David Ige, et al
as 20-16676
Defendant / Appellee:
HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT, a municipality in the State of Hawaii, DAVID Y. IGE, Governor, and a resident in the State of Hawaii, MAX OTANI, Parole Board Member, a resident in the State of Hawaii and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNELL WIDEMAN
Wideman v. Ige et al
as 1:2020cv00162
Defendant:
Clayton H.W. Hee, Kevin Rego, KFVE 5 and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Reginald Wideman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Char v. KHON et al
as 1:2018cv00304
Defendant:
KHNL, John and Jane Does 1-50, KHON and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Nobriga, Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Char
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. KHNL/KGMB LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Davis
Defendant:
KHNL/KGMB LLC, Raycom Media, Inc., Oahu Publications Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
K. Moseley v. State of Hawaii, et al
as 10-16039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
K. F. MOSELEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII, OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS, (OHA), KGMB - 9 NEWS and others
Moseley v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2010cv00255
Petitioner:
K. F. Moseley
Respondent:
State of Hawaii, Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA), KGMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K. Moseley v. USDCHON
as 10-71427
:
In re: K. F. MOSELEY
Petitioner:
K. F. MOSELEY
Respondent:
USDC, HONOLULU
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF HAWAII, OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS, (OHA), KGMB - 9 NEWS and others
Keen v. KHNL/FVE, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Angela Keen and Angela Keen
Defendant:
KHNL/FVE, LLC, KHNL/FVE, LLC, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
