Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ELLIS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
BRITTANY A. TORRES, KYLEIGH J. INGALIS, LETICIA MARTINEZ-MATEOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorman v. Raglin et al
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
Raglin, Killingsworth and Wayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scruggs v. Bridegroom et al
as 3:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Nicole Bridegroom, Titianna Moody, Jason English and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scruggs v. Nolen et al
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Nolen, Jones, Crittendon and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scruggs v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Sherri Washington, Dakota Killingsworth, Pierre Hernandez and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KILLINGSWORTH v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02351
Plaintiff:
PAUL KILLINGSWORTH
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
